Lens Sag Design Considerations
Posted at h
in Application Notes
Design Importance:
- Sag height, together with lens diameter and refractive index, determines the focal length and optical power of the microlens.
- The higher the sag, the greater the lens’s curvature and optical power—but also the more challenging it becomes to fabricate and characterize.
Process-Dependent Sag Limits:
Fabrication methods have optimal sag ranges based on material properties, process mechanics, and metrology capabilities.
- Greyscale Photolithography:
- Optimal sag range: 5–40 µm
- Below ~5 µm, shallow lens profiles become difficult to accurately define due to:
- Resolution limits of the writing system
- Insufficient contrast in slope
- Challenges in metrology equipment to reliably measure sub-micron curvature variations
- Above ~40 µm:
- Requires deep photoresists, often with lower aspect ratio fidelity
- Difficulties arise in controlling resist thickness uniformity and avoiding slumping or profile deformation
- UV Replication:
- Tolerant of a wide range of sag heights, but still limited by:
- Mold fidelity and release characteristics
- Material shrinkage
- Tolerant of a wide range of sag heights, but still limited by:
- Laser Writing, 3D Printing or Direct Etching:
- Enables higher sags with good accuracy, but slower and less scalable for large-format MLAs
Metrology Limitations:
At low sag values (<5 µm), even the most advanced white light interferometers or confocal profilers may struggle to resolve curvature accurately, particularly in fast f/# lenses or those with subtle slopes. This complicates both development and QC.
Design Alternatives: Micro-Fresnel Lenses
When large lenses (e.g., several mm in diameter) demand high optical power but sag heights exceed feasible fabrication limits, micro-Fresnel lens designs offer a practical alternative.
- Benefits:
- Achieve high optical power with lower sag
- Can be fabricated using traditional lithographic or molding techniques
- Trade-offs:
- Introduce step transitions between Fresnel zones, creating:
- Dead zones where optical power drops
- Scattering artifacts
- Reduced MTF (modulation transfer function)
- Introduce step transitions between Fresnel zones, creating:
Typical zone width near the Fresnel edge can be ~2 µm, which may significantly affect image or beam quality in high-performance systems.
Summary of Trade-Offs
| Sag Height | Fabrication | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| <5 µm | Difficult to characterize and shape | Poor metrology resolution |
| 5–40 µm | Ideal for grayscale lithography | Good shape control, but limit on aperture size |
| >40 µm | Requires thick resist or alternate method | Shape fidelity, aspect ratio control difficult |
| Fresnel Lens | Allows large optics with lower sag | Dead zones, image degradation at ring transitions |
