Lens Sag Design Considerations

Lens Sag Design Considerations

Design Importance:

  • Sag height, together with lens diameter and refractive index, determines the focal length and optical power of the microlens.
  • The higher the sag, the greater the lens’s curvature and optical power—but also the more challenging it becomes to fabricate and characterize.

Process-Dependent Sag Limits:

Fabrication methods have optimal sag ranges based on material properties, process mechanics, and metrology capabilities.

  • Greyscale Photolithography:
    • Optimal sag range: 5–40 µm
    • Below ~5 µm, shallow lens profiles become difficult to accurately define due to:
      • Resolution limits of the writing system
      • Insufficient contrast in slope
      • Challenges in metrology equipment to reliably measure sub-micron curvature variations
    • Above ~40 µm:
      • Requires deep photoresists, often with lower aspect ratio fidelity
      • Difficulties arise in controlling resist thickness uniformity and avoiding slumping or profile deformation
  • UV Replication:
    • Tolerant of a wide range of sag heights, but still limited by:
      • Mold fidelity and release characteristics
      • Material shrinkage
  • Laser Writing, 3D Printing or Direct Etching:
    • Enables higher sags with good accuracy, but slower and less scalable for large-format MLAs

Metrology Limitations:

At low sag values (<5 µm), even the most advanced white light interferometers or confocal profilers may struggle to resolve curvature accurately, particularly in fast f/# lenses or those with subtle slopes. This complicates both development and QC.

Design Alternatives: Micro-Fresnel Lenses

When large lenses (e.g., several mm in diameter) demand high optical power but sag heights exceed feasible fabrication limits, micro-Fresnel lens designs offer a practical alternative.

  • Benefits:
    • Achieve high optical power with lower sag
    • Can be fabricated using traditional lithographic or molding techniques
  • Trade-offs:
    • Introduce step transitions between Fresnel zones, creating:
      • Dead zones where optical power drops
      • Scattering artifacts
      • Reduced MTF (modulation transfer function)

Typical zone width near the Fresnel edge can be ~2 µm, which may significantly affect image or beam quality in high-performance systems.

Summary of Trade-Offs

Sag Height Fabrication Trade-offs
<5 µm Difficult to characterize and shape Poor metrology resolution
5–40 µm Ideal for grayscale lithography Good shape control, but limit on aperture size
>40 µm Requires thick resist or alternate method Shape fidelity, aspect ratio control difficult
Fresnel Lens Allows large optics with lower sag Dead zones, image degradation at ring transitions